Uptake by Conditional Obligations
نویسندگان
چکیده
Dialogues are generated in a joint process of offering and accepting moves. Depending on the dialogue genre, there is usually one participant who takes the initiative; other participants respond to the initiative. In this paper, we further investigate the process of uptake [1, 4]. Essentially, an initiative is ambivalent. The way in which an initiative is ‘taken up’, allows the responder to modify the course of a dialogue. In section 2 we introduce dialogue games. Section 3 analyzes the uptake mechanism as a negotiation of the dialogue game at a meta-level. Section 4 provides a formalization of dialogue games, that can be translated into rules for the individual participants [5]. To deal with possible conflicts, we express such rules as conditional obligations in the boid cognitive agent architecture [2]. Section 5 shows how the uptake mechanism can be expressed in this framework.
منابع مشابه
Conditional Cash Transfers for Maternal Health Interventions: Factors Influencing Uptake in North-Central Nigeria
Background Nigeria accounts for a significant proportion of global maternal mortality figures with little progress made in curbing poor health indices. In a bid to reverse this trend, the Government of Nigeria initiated a conditional cash transfer (CCT) programme to encourage pregnant women utilize services at designated health facilities. This study aims to understand experiences of women who ...
متن کاملA structured argumentation framework for detaching conditional obligations
We present a general formal argumentation system for dealing with the detachment of conditional obligations. Given a set of facts, constraints, and conditional obligations, we answer the question whether an unconditional obligation is detachable by considering reasons for and against its detachment. For the evaluation of arguments in favor of detaching obligations we use a Dung-style argumentat...
متن کاملConditional Obligations in Strategic Situations
We investigate Horty’s action constants and their functioning in action obligations of the form “In the interest of group F of agents, group G of agents ought to perform action K” and in conditional action obligations of the form “If group H of agents performs action L, then in the interest of group F of agents, group G of agents ought to perform action K”. We show that a straightforward Horty-...
متن کاملA Sufficient Completeness Reasoning Tool for Partial Specifications
We present the Maude sufficient completeness tool, which explicitly supports sufficient completeness reasoning for partial conditional specifications having sorts and subsorts and with domains of functions defined by conditional memberships. Our tool consists of two main components: (i) a sufficient completeness analyzer that generates a set of proof obligations which, if discharged, ensures su...
متن کاملObligations as Social Constructs
In this paper we formalize sanction-based obligations in the context of Searle’s construction of social reality. In particular, we define obligations using a counts as conditional, Anderson’s reduction to alethic modal logic and Boella and Lesmo’s normative agent. Our analysis presents an alternative criticism to the weakening rule, which has already been criticized in the philosophical literat...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003